fix: overwrite validation decorators from parent class when defined i…#2641
Open
rdubigny wants to merge 3 commits intotypestack:developfrom
Open
fix: overwrite validation decorators from parent class when defined i…#2641rdubigny wants to merge 3 commits intotypestack:developfrom
rdubigny wants to merge 3 commits intotypestack:developfrom
Conversation
6 tasks
rdubigny
added a commit
to proconnect-gouv/federation
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
**Problem** They are inheritance issues in `class-validator` (see issue: typestack/class-validator#633). We updated a PR to fix this problem: typestack/class-validator#2641. However, the chances of it ever being merged are low, as the repository no longer appears to be actively maintained. **Proposal** Use the patched package and import it via an "ugly" tarball approach. This should push us toward eventually migrating to another validation library such as Zod.
rdubigny
added a commit
to proconnect-gouv/federation
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
**Problem** They are inheritance issues in `class-validator` (see issue: typestack/class-validator#633). We updated a PR to fix this problem: typestack/class-validator#2641. However, the chances of it ever being merged are low, as the repository no longer appears to be actively maintained. **Proposal** Use the patched package and import it via an "ugly" github link. This should push us toward eventually migrating to another validation library such as Zod.
rdubigny
added a commit
to proconnect-gouv/federation
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
**Problem** They are inheritance issues in `class-validator` (see issue: typestack/class-validator#633). We updated a PR to fix this problem: typestack/class-validator#2641. However, the chances of it ever being merged are low, as the repository no longer appears to be actively maintained. **Proposal** Use the patched package and import it via an "ugly" github link. This should push us toward eventually migrating to another validation library such as Zod.
rdubigny
added a commit
to proconnect-gouv/federation
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
**Problem** They are inheritance issues in `class-validator` (see issue: typestack/class-validator#633). We updated a PR to fix this problem: typestack/class-validator#2641. However, the chances of it ever being merged are low, as the repository no longer appears to be actively maintained. **Proposal** Use the patched package and import it via an "ugly" github link. This should push us toward eventually migrating to another validation library such as Zod.
rdubigny
added a commit
to proconnect-gouv/federation
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
**Problem** They are inheritance issues in `class-validator` (see issue: typestack/class-validator#633). We updated a PR to fix this problem: typestack/class-validator#2641. However, the chances of it ever being merged are low, as the repository no longer appears to be actively maintained. **Proposal** Use the patched package and import it via an "ugly" github link. This should push us toward eventually migrating to another validation library such as Zod.
rdubigny
added a commit
to proconnect-gouv/federation
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
**Problem** They are inheritance issues in `class-validator` (see issue: typestack/class-validator#633). We updated a PR to fix this problem: typestack/class-validator#2641. However, the chances of it ever being merged are low, as the repository no longer appears to be actively maintained. **Proposal** Use the patched package and import it via an "ugly" github link. This should push us toward eventually migrating to another validation library such as Zod.
BenoitSerrano
pushed a commit
to proconnect-gouv/federation
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2025
**Problem** They are inheritance issues in `class-validator` (see issue: typestack/class-validator#633). We updated a PR to fix this problem: typestack/class-validator#2641. However, the chances of it ever being merged are low, as the repository no longer appears to be actively maintained. **Proposal** Use the patched package and import it via an "ugly" github link. This should push us toward eventually migrating to another validation library such as Zod.
|
Great idea @rdubigny, have you maybe thought of a way to exclude parent validator from being used? Or anything like that maybe? |
Author
Hello @Setitch, In this PR, I focused solely on updating #748 without trying to introduce any new changes. That said, I’m not convinced this is a good idea. In TypeScript, inheritance follows the Liskov Substitution Principle, which states:
If a parent class defines |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This is an updated rebase of #748 .
Fixes a bug that caused decorated properties which are also decorated in inherited classes, to skip their inherited validation.
Checklist
Fixes
fixes #633 , fixes #622