Add FT models supported and limits

[connermanuel]

This PR adds two already existing endpoints to openapi, both relating to supported models in the FT API.

[github-actions]

✱ Stainless preview builds

This PR will update the togetherai SDKs with the following commit message.

feat: Add FT models supported and limits

✅ togetherai-openapi studio · code

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic.
generate ✅

✅ togetherai-python studio · code

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic.
generate ✅ → build ✅ → lint ✅ → test ⏭️

pip install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/togetherai-python/846fc6b7055282e61e5db4001fa3ebc7730d5696/together-2.3.0-py3-none-any.whl

⚠️ togetherai-typescript studio · code

Your SDK build had a failure in the build CI job, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ✅ → build ❗ → lint ❗ → test ✅

✅ togetherai-go studio · code

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic.
generate ✅ → build ⏭️ → lint ✅ → test ✅

go get github.com/stainless-sdks/togetherai-go@c299db32814c19794a9fd81fd7d14be71c65e509

✅ togetherai-terraform studio · code

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic.
generate ✅ → lint ✅ → test ✅

---

This comment is auto-generated by GitHub Actions and is automatically kept up to date as you push.
If you push custom code to the preview branch, re-run this workflow to update the comment.
Last updated: 2026-03-06 17:34:47 UTC

[connermanuel]

Not sure what you guys think of the name HyperParameterLimits, thats the name in the codebase but these arent all strictly hyperparams, I guess we could do FineTuneModelLimits instead, wdyt

[blainekasten]

I'm ok with just doing FineTuneModelLimits to avoid confusion

[connermanuel]

I asked max about this, we dont cdn cache in case the limits update on our end. Note: this is the SSOT for sequence lengths, etc

[blainekasten]

same for putting description in schema here

[blainekasten]

note, all of these fields are going to be marked as optional in the produced code. You have to add a required: [] field and list all properties that are not optional.

[blainekasten]

This is looking great! I need to request that you add required markers to the types before we merge.

Also sharing this that I'm requesting citadel to add a field for product support that would change the way we query for model support in by product potentially meaning we could deprecate this API endpoing

[connermanuel]

Also sharing this that I'm requesting citadel to add a field for product support that would change the way we query for model support in by product potentially meaning we could deprecate this API endpoing

Thanks for the heads up, this is fine as long as that endpoint surfaces the information contained in shaping's models.yaml, which we can sync about later.

[connermanuel]

Based on what isnt omitempty in the go struct