Skip to content

ROX-33079: Improve CVE name description for supported formats#43

Open
mtodor wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
mtodor/ROX-33079-fix-CVE-name-description
Open

ROX-33079: Improve CVE name description for supported formats#43
mtodor wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
mtodor/ROX-33079-fix-CVE-name-description

Conversation

@mtodor
Copy link
Collaborator

@mtodor mtodor commented Feb 12, 2026

Description

This PR updates vulnerability tool descriptions to accurately reflect support for multiple vulnerability identifier formats beyond CVE.

Changes

  • deployments.go: Added 24 supported formats to schema description and tool description
  • nodes.go: Added 4 supported formats
  • clusters.go: Added 4 supported formats
  • Updated validation error messages to show example identifier formats
  • README.md: Added examples using GHSA and RHSA identifiers
  • architecture.md: Added "Supported Vulnerability Identifier Formats" section with comprehensive examples

Validation

  • unit tests
  • manual tests

@mtodor mtodor requested a review from janisz as a code owner February 12, 2026 13:54
@mtodor mtodor force-pushed the mtodor/ROX-33079-fix-CVE-name-description branch from abe591d to 8656ec0 Compare February 12, 2026 15:50
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.37%. Comparing base (15d002e) to head (8656ec0).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #43      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.22%   78.37%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        1208     1216       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits          945      953       +8     
  Misses        223      223              
  Partials       40       40              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants