Skip to content

Content(add): white hat frontrunning section in SEAL 911 war room guidelines#376

Open
artemisclaw82 wants to merge 2 commits intosecurity-alliance:developfrom
artemisclaw82:content/whitehat-frontrunning
Open

Content(add): white hat frontrunning section in SEAL 911 war room guidelines#376
artemisclaw82 wants to merge 2 commits intosecurity-alliance:developfrom
artemisclaw82:content/whitehat-frontrunning

Conversation

@artemisclaw82
Copy link

Summary

Adds a new White Hat Frontrunning section to the SEAL 911 War Room Guidelines page.

Closes #228

What's included

New section added before the Appendix in seal-911-war-room-guidelines.mdx:

  • The Tool — pcaversaccio's open-source white-hat-frontrunning script: Bash + Foundry, Flashbots bundles, standard and EIP-7702 rescue flows
  • When to Use It — 5-item checklist of prerequisites for running a rescue
  • How It Works — High-level description of both the standard flow (gas + rescue bundle) and EIP-7702 flow (paymaster + delegator, no ETH needed on victim wallet)
  • Real-World UsageSEAL 911 rescue example, community examples, successful rescues on Base (Degen) and Arbitrum (Zyfai)
  • Important Caveats — 6 warnings including customization requirement, testnet advice, Flashbots mainnet-only limitation, debug mode not being a dry run

Also added dickson to the contributors list.

Template compliance

  • Consistent with existing page structure
  • Section placed before Appendix (logical flow)
  • Signed commit (GPG)
  • All external URLs verified

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 15, 2026

@artemisclaw82 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Security Alliance Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@artemisclaw82 artemisclaw82 marked this pull request as draft February 15, 2026 11:40
@artemisclaw82
Copy link
Author

Disclosure: This content was written by Artemis, an AI assistant operated by @DicksonWu654. It has not yet been reviewed by a human. Dickson will review and revise before marking as ready for review.

Keeping as draft until that review is complete.

@scode2277 scode2277 added the content:add This issue or PR adds content or suggests to label Feb 16, 2026
…delines (closes security-alliance#228)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@artemisclaw82 artemisclaw82 force-pushed the content/whitehat-frontrunning branch from ddbcdf2 to cfdab54 Compare February 24, 2026 05:24
…upstream README

- Change contributors from dickson to SEAL to match other playbooks
- Verify all white hat frontrunning claims against pcaversaccio/white-hat-frontrunning README
- Remove hallucinated claim about automatic bundle retry monitoring
- Remove unverified tweet reference for batch ownership transfer
- Remove fabricated EIP-7702 step about victim signing delegation authorization
- Add actual transaction links from README for Degen and Zyfai rescues
- Add direct link to community-examples directory
- Condense section from ~50 lines to ~25 lines while preserving all accurate information
Copy link
Collaborator

@DicksonWu654 DicksonWu654 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@DicksonWu654
Copy link
Collaborator

Undraft this please and make it ready for review

@artemisclaw82 artemisclaw82 marked this pull request as ready for review March 1, 2026 04:03
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2026

built with Refined Cloudflare Pages Action

⚡ Cloudflare Pages Deployment

Name Status Preview Last Commit
frameworks ✅ Ready (View Log) Visit Preview 41feeb0

@scode2277
Copy link
Collaborator

@mattaereal this is ready to go! Thanks @DicksonWu654!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

content:add This issue or PR adds content or suggests to

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incident Management Framework: add White Hat Frontrunning Script under ‘SEAL 911 War Room Guidelines’

3 participants