fix: correct minor inconsistencies in docs and comments

[pradhyum6144]

Noticed a few small inconsistencies while reading through the codebase:

• config_test.go: copyright header still says "CNAI Authors" — updated to "CNCF ModelPack Authors" to match the rest of the project
• config.md: example JSON used "fp16" and "pytorch" but the documented values are "float16" and "pt" — fixed the example to match
• annotations.go: comment above AnnotationMediaTypeUntested said AnnotationUntested — fixed to match the actual constant name

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @pradhyum6144, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses several minor inconsistencies found across the codebase and documentation. The changes ensure that copyright information is current, documentation examples accurately reflect the expected values, and code comments correctly reference their associated constants, thereby improving overall code clarity and consistency.

Highlights

• Copyright Header Update: The copyright header in config_test.go has been updated from 'CNAI Authors' to 'CNCF ModelPack Authors' to align with the project's current branding.
• Documentation Example Correction: The example JSON in config.md was updated to use the correct values 'pt' for format and 'float16' for precision, matching the documented specifications.
• Comment Consistency Fix: A comment in annotations.go for AnnotationMediaTypeUntested was corrected to accurately reflect the constant's name.

Changelog

• docs/config.md
  • Corrected example JSON values for format from "pytorch" to "pt" and precision from "fp16" to "float16" to match documented values.
• schema/config_test.go
  • Updated the copyright header from 'The CNAI Authors' to 'The CNCF ModelPack Authors'.
• specs-go/v1/annotations.go
  • Corrected the comment for AnnotationMediaTypeUntested to accurately state AnnotationMediaTypeUntested instead of AnnotationUntested.

Activity

• No human activity has occurred on this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

The pull request effectively addresses minor inconsistencies in documentation and comments, enhancing the overall clarity and accuracy of the codebase. The changes correctly update the copyright header, align example JSON values with documented specifications, and rectify a comment to match its corresponding constant name. These are valuable improvements for maintainability and consistency.