GhostingFunctor clone() should be pure virtual #4396
Merged
+6
−4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(at least in non-deprecated builds)
|
Job Coverage, step Generate coverage on d1bf1fe wanted to post the following: CoverageInconsistent report tags were found between the head and base reports. Inconsistent tags: This comment will be updated on new commits. |
jwpeterson
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2026
Member
Author
|
MOOSE python test failures are unrelated. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(at least in non-deprecated builds)
We intended to allow all ghosting functors to be cloneable years ago; let's start gradually enforcing it.
This lets the additional mesh copying done by #3759 internal testing be applied to meshes that were previously un-copyable.