fix(models): avoid duplicate interaction final responses#4385
fix(models): avoid duplicate interaction final responses#4385sasukearata123 wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
Summary of ChangesHello @sasukearata123, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses and resolves issues related to the handling of streaming LLM responses, specifically focusing on preventing duplicate final responses and correctly aggregating text parts that might overlap. By introducing more precise logic for determining interaction completion and implementing a robust text merging mechanism, the changes ensure that the system consistently provides a single, accurate, and complete final response from streamed interactions. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Response from ADK Triaging Agent Hello @sasukearata123, thank you for creating this PR! To help us review your contribution, could you please fill out the pull request template in the description? This includes linking to an existing issue (or creating one), describing the problem and solution, and providing a testing plan. This information will help reviewers to review your PR more efficiently. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively resolves an issue with duplicate final responses in streaming mode from the interactions API. The core of the fix involves centralizing the logic for emitting the final response to either an interaction.status_update event or a fallback at the end of the stream, while ignoring content.stop and interaction events that previously caused duplicates. A flag, has_emitted_turn_complete, is cleverly used to prevent the fallback from firing unnecessarily.
Additionally, the PR introduces robust logic to merge overlapping text deltas from the stream, ensuring that the aggregated text content in the final response is correct. This is implemented in the new _merge_text_with_overlap and _append_delta_text_part helper functions.
The changes are supported by a comprehensive set of new unit tests that validate both the prevention of duplicate responses and the correct merging of text content. The code is clear, well-commented, and the overall solution is solid.
|
Hi @sasukearata123 , Thank you for your contribution! We need additional information to start the review. Please provide a clear description of the changes, and if applicable, supporting details such as screenshots, logs, and/or unit tests. Providing more context will help us understand the purpose of your contribution and expedite the review process. |
Please ensure you have read the contribution guide before creating a pull request.
Link to Issue or Description of Change
1. Link to an existing issue (if applicable):
2. Or, if no issue exists, describe the change:
If applicable, please follow the issue templates to provide as much detail as
possible.
Problem:
A clear and concise description of what the problem is.
Solution:
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen and why you choose
this solution.
Testing Plan
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. This is required
for all PRs that are not small documentation or typo fixes.
Unit Tests:
Please include a summary of passed
pytestresults.Manual End-to-End (E2E) Tests:
Please provide instructions on how to manually test your changes, including any
necessary setup or configuration. Please provide logs or screenshots to help
reviewers better understand the fix.
Checklist
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.