Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade supertest from 6.3.3 to 7.1.3#148

Open
y-o-u wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-d9bb4951bf70a891465ba6a401161090
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade supertest from 6.3.3 to 7.1.3#148
y-o-u wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-d9bb4951bf70a891465ba6a401161090

Conversation

@y-o-u
Copy link
Collaborator

@y-o-u y-o-u commented Feb 15, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/plugins/@nocobase/plugin-error-handler/package.json

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the yarn.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JS-QS-15268416
  708  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

…reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-QS-15268416
@github-actions
Copy link

Tests results for "E2E"

11 flaky ⚠️ [chromium] › core/client/src/modules/blocks/data-blocks/table/__e2e__/schemaSettings.test.ts:81:9 › actions schema settings › add new › open mode
⚠️ [chromium] › plugins/@nocobase/plugin-acl/src/client/__e2e__/configure.test.ts:13:5 › allows to configure interface
⚠️ [chromium] › plugins/@nocobase/plugin-action-bulk-edit/src/client/__e2e__/schemaSettings.test.ts:14:7 › bulk edit action setting › data will be updated && edit form configure
⚠️ [chromium] › plugins/@nocobase/plugin-auth/src/client/__e2e__/auth.test.ts:21:7 › auth › register
⚠️ [chromium] › plugins/@nocobase/plugin-file-manager/src/client/__e2e__/createLocalStorage.test.ts:15:7 › file manager › add new local storage
⚠️ [chromium] › plugins/@nocobase/plugin-action-bulk-update/src/client/__e2e__/schemaInitailizer.test.ts:14:7 › TableActionInitializers & GanttActionInitializers & MapActionInitializers › TableActionInitializers should add bulk update
⚠️ [chromium] › core/client/src/modules/menu/__e2e__/schemaInitializer.test.ts:82:7 › add menu item › link: use variable
⚠️ [chromium] › plugins/@nocobase/plugin-action-bulk-edit/src/client/__e2e__/schemaInitailizer.test.ts:14:7 › TableActionInitializers & GanttActionInitializers & MapActionInitializers should add bulk edit action › bulk edit in TableActionInitializers
⚠️ [chromium] › core/client/src/modules/blocks/data-blocks/form/__e2e__/form-create/schemaSettings.test.ts:657:7 › set default value › Parent popup record in sub page. The first level is a subpage, and the second level is a subpage too
⚠️ [chromium] › core/client/src/modules/variable/__e2e__/currentObject.test.ts:14:7 › variable: current object › in sub table
⚠️ [chromium] › plugins/@nocobase/plugin-action-duplicate/src/client/__e2e__/schemaSettings.test.ts:14:7 › direct duplicate & copy into the form and continue to fill in › direct duplicate

973 passed, 30 skipped
✔️✔️✔️

Full HTML report. Merge workflow run.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants