Conversation
|
@tim-aero, this dependency has another branch for versions 3.0+ (relocated to tools.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml) with the future support, the current branch has LTS but will eventually discontinued at some point. The 3.0+ versions require Java 17+, are there any plans to update Java Object Mapper to support it? |
|
@tim-aero, another question is whether we should use SnakeYAML directly (which continues to support Java 8). If yes, we will need to check what to rewrite and how feasible is that. |
tim-aero
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like organizationally we're moving towards SnakeYaml, we probably should see if moving this to SnakeYaml is easy while we're touching it anyway.
|
@tim-aero, the replace is done. So far the cleanest solution looks like accepting the break, maybe additionally documenting it. SnakeYAML throws Other than that, there is |
No description provided.