Skip to content

Feature: Allow setting annotations exclusively on dcgmExporter#1717

Closed
leolimas wants to merge 1 commit intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
leolimas:feature/add-dcgmExporter-exclusive-annotations-support
Closed

Feature: Allow setting annotations exclusively on dcgmExporter#1717
leolimas wants to merge 1 commit intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
leolimas:feature/add-dcgmExporter-exclusive-annotations-support

Conversation

@leolimas
Copy link

@leolimas leolimas commented Sep 22, 2025

This change implements support for setting dedicated annotations on the DCGM Exporter. Additionally, it adds new test cases to ensure the new functionality is properly validated.

Issue: #1716

Modified files:

  • api/nvidia/v1/clusterpolicy_types.go
  • api/nvidia/v1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go
  • bundle/manifests/nvidia.com_clusterpolicies.yaml
  • config/crd/bases/nvidia.com_clusterpolicies.yaml
  • controllers/object_controls.go
  • controllers/transforms_test.go
  • deployments/gpu-operator/crds/nvidia.com_clusterpolicies.yaml
  • deployments/gpu-operator/templates/clusterpolicy.yaml

@copy-pr-bot
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Sep 22, 2025

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

…he DCGM Exporter. Additionally, it adds new test cases to ensure the new functionality is properly validated.

Modified files:
api/nvidia/v1/clusterpolicy_types.go
api/nvidia/v1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go
bundle/manifests/nvidia.com_clusterpolicies.yaml
config/crd/bases/nvidia.com_clusterpolicies.yaml
controllers/object_controls.go
controllers/transforms_test.go
deployments/gpu-operator/crds/nvidia.com_clusterpolicies.yaml
deployments/gpu-operator/templates/clusterpolicy.yaml

Signed-off-by: Leonardo Lima Silva <contato@leonardolima.com.br>
Signed-off-by: leolimas <contato@leonardolima.com.br>
@leolimas leolimas force-pushed the feature/add-dcgmExporter-exclusive-annotations-support branch from 632c4fc to 366e7c8 Compare September 22, 2025 21:53
@elezar elezar removed their request for review October 15, 2025 13:51
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. This PR will be closed in 30 days unless new comments are made or the stale label is removed. To skip these checks, apply the "lifecycle/frozen" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 20, 2026
@rahulait rahulait removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 23, 2026
@tariq1890
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @leolimas, thank you for the taking the time to contribute to gpu-operator! Unfortunately, this is a duplicate #1642, so we'll be iterating on that instead to get this change in.

Thank you for your understanding and patience.

@tariq1890 tariq1890 closed this Feb 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants