Id length check is too restrictive

[LittleHuba]

https://github.com/eclipse-score/docs-as-code/blob/4473a7a5dc9f4c1ec3914bfcc4188d1987aad749/src/extensions/score_metamodel/checks/attributes_format.py#L60

This check restricts ids to 45 characters. This is way too restrictive for modules like communication or baselibs.
With the mandatory prefix only a few characters are left. This forces obscure ids based on hashes or numbers which makes the ids error-prone to link.

Please increase the length to at least 70 characters to allow for a reasonable id while still keeping the impact on links in documents manageable.

[AlexanderLanin]

I'll move this to process, as "monthly id length discussion" ;-)

The standard suggestion is to abbreviate communication and baselibs, e.g. com and bl.

[AlexanderLanin]

It does seem like there is no proper documentation available. Only this code snippet:

https://github.com/eclipse-score/docs-as-code/blob/1067fb67782389b50827f8637a74b1027ece52ee/src/extensions/score_metamodel/checks/attributes_format.py#L62-L65

[AlexanderLanin]

Old issues:

• docs: adapt checks score#204
• docs: naming scheme for IDs score#180
• Improvement: (Discussion) Allow 90 instead of 45 characters for requirement ids score#1026

[aschemmel-tech]

Thanks Alexander for providing the reasoning and the solution we had thought about in the above (old) issues. As far as I see this, the communication team would like to use "requirement specific identifiers" which are already 45 characters long. So the solution (using feature or component abbreviations) is not helping here. I remember that we discussed at the time to hide the attribute section containing the requirements links per default to avoid the cluttering of the documentation with lenghty ids.

[Chidananda-Swamy]

Fix Proposal:
in process/conf.py : Update needs_role_need_template to use {title} so :need links render only the title (no ({id})), so long requirement IDs no longer appear in the HTML even if they exceed 45 characters.

PR: #601